The modern shrinking city
(posted Oct 9)
As this article (a longer preview is available here) from the Boston Globe points out, urban planners in some American cities are trying to figure out how to retrench – often because a declining population and economic hardship have shrunk the tax base.
This WSJ article here — subtitled “asphalt is replaced by cheaper grave; back to the stone age” (my emphasis) — describes how some states have deliberately moved back to gravel roads.
To my knowledge, the same hasn’t happened in Canada, perhaps because severe income inequality hasn’t spurred a generation of plutocrat-friendly legislation… yet. (Income inequality tends to make the impoverished vote conservative — perhaps out of a sense that an “other” is keeping them from breaking into the “haves” class?)
This seems vaguely analogous to the Byzantine Empire’s decision during the Macedonian Revival, to keep its borders manageable and not overextend itself. It must’ve been tempting for the Emperors to keep more modest borders than were achieved under the dynamic duo of Justinian and Belisarius, but they were ultimately better off for it.
Right now, cities and states are having to retrench their infrastructure — a more realistic scenario under their current constraints, which must nevertheless be gnashingly frustrating for all parties involved. Just as it must’ve been for the Macedonian Emperors…





